patch-2.3.42 linux/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
Next file: linux/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
Previous file: linux/net/ipv4/tcp.c
Back to the patch index
Back to the overall index
- Lines: 130
- Date:
Mon Jan 31 23:41:14 2000
- Orig file:
v2.3.41/linux/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
- Orig date:
Fri Jan 28 15:09:09 2000
diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.3.41/linux/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c linux/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
*
* Implementation of the Transmission Control Protocol(TCP).
*
- * Version: $Id: tcp_input.c,v 1.183 2000/01/24 18:40:33 davem Exp $
+ * Version: $Id: tcp_input.c,v 1.186 2000/01/31 20:26:13 davem Exp $
*
* Authors: Ross Biro, <bir7@leland.Stanford.Edu>
* Fred N. van Kempen, <waltje@uWalt.NL.Mugnet.ORG>
@@ -1346,7 +1346,8 @@
goto kill_with_rst;
/* Dup ACK? */
- if (!after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, tw->rcv_nxt)) {
+ if (!after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, tw->rcv_nxt) ||
+ TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq == TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq) {
tcp_tw_put(tw);
return TCP_TW_SUCCESS;
}
@@ -1912,6 +1913,8 @@
!tp->urg_data) {
int chunk = min(skb->len, tp->ucopy.len);
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+
local_bh_enable();
if (memcpy_toiovec(tp->ucopy.iov, skb->data, chunk)) {
sk->err = EFAULT;
@@ -1948,10 +1951,9 @@
!tp->urg_data)
tcp_fast_path_on(tp);
- if (eaten)
+ if (eaten) {
kfree_skb(skb);
-
- if (!sk->dead) {
+ } else if (!sk->dead) {
wake_up_interruptible(sk->sleep);
sock_wake_async(sk->socket,1, POLL_IN);
}
@@ -2296,29 +2298,7 @@
* fails? -ANK
*/
- /* F.e. one possible tactics is: */
- do {
- u32 new_clamp = (tp->rcv_nxt-tp->copied_seq) + pruned;
-
- /* This guy is not a good guy. I bet, he martirized cats,
- * when was child and grew up to finished sadist. Clamp him!
- */
- if (new_clamp > 3*tp->ack.rcv_mss)
- new_clamp -= tp->ack.rcv_mss;
- else
- new_clamp = 2*tp->ack.rcv_mss;
- tp->window_clamp = min(tp->window_clamp, new_clamp);
- } while (0);
- /* Though it should be made earlier, when we are still not
- * congested. This header prediction logic sucks
- * without true implementation of VJ algorithm.
- * I am really anxious. How was it possible to combine
- * header prediction and sending ACKs outside of recvmsg() context?
- * They _are_ incompatible. We should not advance window so
- * brainlessly and we should not advertise so huge window from the very
- * beginning. BTW window "prediction" does not speedup anything!
- * SIlly, silly, silly.
- */
+ tp->ack.quick = 0;
if(atomic_read(&sk->rmem_alloc) < (sk->rcvbuf << 1))
return 0;
@@ -2525,10 +2505,14 @@
NET_INC_STATS_BH(TCPHPHitsToUser);
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+
if (tcp_copy_to_iovec(sk, skb, tcp_header_len))
goto csum_error;
__skb_pull(skb,tcp_header_len);
+
+ tp->rcv_nxt = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
} else {
if (tcp_checksum_complete_user(sk, skb))
goto csum_error;
@@ -2548,15 +2532,15 @@
*/
__skb_queue_tail(&sk->receive_queue, skb);
skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);
- }
- tp->rcv_nxt = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
+ tp->rcv_nxt = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
- /* FIN bit check is not done since if FIN is set in
- * this frame, the pred_flags won't match up. -DaveM
- */
- wake_up_interruptible(sk->sleep);
- sock_wake_async(sk->socket,1, POLL_IN);
+ /* FIN bit check is not done since if FIN is set in
+ * this frame, the pred_flags won't match up. -DaveM
+ */
+ wake_up_interruptible(sk->sleep);
+ sock_wake_async(sk->socket,1, POLL_IN);
+ }
tcp_event_data_recv(tp, skb);
@@ -3467,7 +3451,8 @@
int tmo;
if (tp->linger2 < 0 ||
- after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - th->fin, tp->rcv_nxt)) {
+ (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq != TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq &&
+ after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - th->fin, tp->rcv_nxt))) {
tcp_done(sk);
return 1;
}
@@ -3526,7 +3511,8 @@
* BSD 4.4 also does reset.
*/
if (sk->shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) {
- if (after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - th->fin, tp->rcv_nxt)) {
+ if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq != TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq &&
+ after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - th->fin, tp->rcv_nxt)) {
tcp_reset(sk);
return 1;
}
FUNET's LINUX-ADM group, linux-adm@nic.funet.fi
TCL-scripts by Sam Shen (who was at: slshen@lbl.gov)