Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) N. Freed
Request for Comments: 5784 S. Vedam
Category: Standards Track Sun Microsystems
ISSN: 2070-1721 March 2010
Sieve Email Filtering: Sieves and Display Directives in XML
Abstract
This document describes a way to represent Sieve email filtering
language scripts in XML. Representing Sieves in XML is intended not
as an alternate storage format for Sieve but rather as a means to
facilitate manipulation of scripts using XML tools.
The XML representation also defines additional elements that have no
counterparts in the regular Sieve language. These elements are
intended for use by graphical user interfaces and provide facilities
for labeling or grouping sections of a script so they can be
displayed more conveniently. These elements are represented as
specially structured comments in regular Sieve format.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5784.
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Grammatical Structure of Sieve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. XML Representation of Sieve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.1. XML Display Directives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.2. Structured Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.3. Validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Appendix A. Extended Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Appendix B. XML Schema for Sieves in XML . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Appendix C. Relax NG Schema for Sieves in XML . . . . . . . . . . 24
Appendix D. Stylesheet for Conversion from XML . . . . . . . . . 26
Appendix E. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
1. Introduction
Sieve [RFC5228] is a language for filtering email messages at or
around the time of final delivery. It is designed to be
implementable on either a mail client or mail server. It is meant to
be extensible, simple, and independent of access protocol, mail
architecture, and operating system, and it is intended to be
manipulated by a variety of different user interfaces.
Some user interface environments have extensive existing facilities
for manipulating material represented in XML [XML]. While adding
support for alternate data syntaxes may be possible in most if not
all of these environments, it may not be particularly convenient to
do so. The obvious way to deal with this issue is to map Sieves into
XML, possibly on a separate back-end system, manipulate the XML, and
convert it back to normal Sieve format.
The fact that conversion into and out of XML may be done as a
separate operation on a different system argues strongly for defining
a common XML representation for Sieve. This way, different front-end
user interfaces can be used with different back-end mapping and
storage facilities.
Another issue with the creation and manipulation of Sieve scripts by
user interfaces is that the language is strictly focused on
describing email filtering operations. The language contains no
mechanisms for indicating how a given script should be presented in a
user interface. Such information can be represented in XML very
easily, so it makes sense to define a framework to do this as part of
the XML format. A structured comment convention is then used to
retain this information when the script is converted to normal Sieve
format.
It should be noted, however, that the ability for different front
ends to use the same mapping and storage facilities does not mean
that the additional XML information produced by different front ends
will interoperate.
Various Sieve extensions have already been defined, e.g., [RFC5183],
[RFC5229], [RFC5230], [RFC5231], [RFC5232], [RFC5233], [RFC5235],
[RFC5293], and more are planned. The set of extensions available
varies from one implementation to the next and may even change as a
result of configuration choices. It is therefore essential that the
XML representation of Sieve be able to accommodate Sieve extensions
without requiring schema changes. It is also desirable that Sieve
extensions not require changes to the code that converts to and from
the XML representation.
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
This specification defines an XML representation for Sieve scripts
and explains how the conversion process to and from XML works. The
XML representation is capable of accommodating any future Sieve
extension as long as the underlying Sieve grammar remains unchanged.
Furthermore, code that converts from XML to the normal Sieve format
requires no changes to accommodate extensions, while code used to
convert from normal Sieve format to XML only requires changes when
new control commands are added -- a rare event. An XML Schema, Relax
NG Schema, and a sample stylesheet to convert from XML format are
also provided in the appendices.
2. Conventions Used in This Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
The term "processor" is used throughout this document to refer to
agents that convert Sieve to and from the XML representation. The
term "editor" refers to agents that operate on, possibly creating or
modifying, Sieves in XML format.
3. Grammatical Structure of Sieve
The Sieve language is designed to be highly extensible without making
any changes to the basic language syntax. Accordingly, the syntax of
Sieve, defined in Section 8 of [RFC5228], is entirely structural in
nature and employs no reserved words of any sort.
Structurally, a Sieve script consists of a series of commands. Each
command, in turn, consists of an identifier, zero or more arguments,
an optional test or test-list, and finally an optional block
containing another series of commands. Commands are further broken
down into controls and actions, although this distinction cannot be
determined from the grammar.
Some example Sieve controls are:
stop; <-- No arguments, test, or command block
require "fileinto"; <-- Control with a single argument
if true {stop;} <-- Control with test and command block
Some examples of Sieve actions are:
discard; <-- Action with no arguments, test, or command block
fileinto "folder"; <-- Action with an argument
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
At the time of this writing, there are no controls defined that
accept both arguments and a test. Similarly, there are currently no
defined actions that allow either a test or a command block.
Nevertheless, the Sieve grammar allows such constructs to be defined
by some future extension.
A test consists of an identifier followed by zero or more arguments,
then another test or test-list. Unlike commands, tests cannot be
followed by a command block.
Here are some examples of Sieve tests. Note that such tests have to
appear as part of a command in order to be syntactically valid:
true <-- Test with no argument or subordinate test
envelope "to" "me@example.com" <-- Test with several arguments
header :is "from" "you@example.com" <-- Test with tagged argument
Command or test arguments can be either string lists, whole numbers,
or tags. (Tags are simply identifiers preceded by a colon.) Note
that although the Sieve grammar treats single strings as a degenerate
case of a string list, some tests or actions have arguments that can
only be individual strings, not lists.
Here is an example showing the use of both a test-list and a string
list:
if anyof (not exists ["From", "Date"],
header :contains "from" "fool@example.edu") {
discard;
}
Extensions can add new controls, actions, tests, or arguments to
existing controls or actions. Extensions have also changed how
string content is interpreted, although this is not relevant to this
specification. However, it is especially important to note that so
far, only one of the many defined Sieve extensions -- the
foreverypart extension [RFC5703] -- has added new controls to the
language. It seems safe to assume that, due to their nature, future
addition of controls will be relatively rare.
Finally, comments are allowed between lexical elements in a Sieve
script. One important use case for comments is encoding meta-data
about the script, a facility that is lacking in the Sieve language.
Therefore, comments need to be preserved in the XML representation.
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
4. XML Representation of Sieve
Sieve controls and actions are represented in XML as "control" or
"action" elements, respectively. The command's identifier appears as
a name attribute on the element itself. This is the only attribute
allowed on controls and actions -- arguments, tests, test-lists, and
nested command blocks are all represented as nested elements. While
naming the element after the control or action itself may seem like a
better choice, doing so would result in extensions requiring frequent
corresponding schema changes.
The example Sieve controls shown in the previous section would be
represented as these XML fragments:
fileinto
The example Sieve actions shown above would appear in XML as:
folder
The separation of controls from actions in the XML representation
means that conversion from normal Sieve format to XML has to be able
to distinguish between controls and actions. This is easily done by
maintaining a list of all known controls since experience indicates
new controls are rarely added. At the time of this writing, the list
of defined controls consists of:
1. if [RFC5228],
2. stop [RFC5228],
3. require [RFC5228],
4. foreverypart [RFC5703], and
5. break [RFC5703].
It should be noted that with this approach unknown controls will
simply be treated as actions and can be passed back and forth between
the two representations. The treatment of a control as an action is
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
unlikely to cause other issues since knowledge of a control's
language semantics is almost always required to take advantage of it.
Tests are represented in the same basic way as controls and actions,
that is, as a "test" element with a name attribute giving the test
identifier. For example, the following XML fragments show various
types of tests:
tome@example.com
isfromyou@example.com
String, number, and tag arguments are represented as "str", "num",
and "tag" elements, respectively. The actual string, number, or tag
identifier appears as text inside the element. None of these
elements have any defined attributes. Several examples of arguments
have already appeared in the preceding control, action, and test
examples. Any whitespace in the str body content MUST be preserved
by the processor. Also, note that since strings and tags are
represented as element text, any quotes or other syntactic elements
required in the regular Sieve representation are dropped rather than
being carried over into the XML.
String list arguments are represented as a "list" element, which in
turn contains one or more str elements. Note that this allows the
distinction between a single string and a string list containing a
single string to be preserved. This is not essential since a list
containing a single string could simply be mapped to a string, but it
seems prudent to maintain the distinction when mapping to and from
XML.
Nested command blocks appear as a series of control or action
elements inside of an outer control or action element. No block
element is needed since an inner command block can only appear once
and only after any arguments, tests, or test-lists. For example:
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
FromDate
contains
from
fool@example.edu
Sieve comments are mapped to a special "comment" element in XML.
Both hash and bracketed comments are mapped to the same construct so
the distinction between the two is lost in XML. XML comments are not
used because some XML tools do not make it convenient to access
comment nodes.
Comments are allowed between commands and inside "test" elements.
But comments aren't allowed directly inside commands -- due to
limitations of XML Schema, special enclosing "preamble" and
"postamble" elements are needed:
Check to see if message should be discarded
FromDate
contains
from
fool@example.edu
End of discard check
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
4.1. XML Display Directives
Sometimes graphical user interfaces are a convenient way to provide
Sieve management functions to users. These interfaces typically
summarize/annotate/group/display Sieve script(s) in an intuitive way
for end users.
To do this effectively, the graphical user interface may require
additional information about the Sieve script itself. That
information or "meta-data" might include, but is not limited to, a
Sieve name (identifying the current Sieve), whether the Sieve is
enabled or disabled, and the order in which the parts of the Sieve
are presented to the user. The graphical user interface may also
choose to provide mechanisms to allow the user to modify the script.
It is often useful for a graphical user interface to group related
Sieve script elements and provide an interface that displays these
groups separately so they can be managed as a single object. Some
examples include Sieve statements that together provide vacation
responders, blacklists/whitelists, and other types of filtering
controls.
Some advanced graphical user interfaces may even provide a natural
language representation of a Sieve script and/or an advanced
interface to present Sieve statements directly to the user.
A graphical user interface may also choose to support only a subset
of action commands in the Sieve language (and its extensions), and so
a mechanism to indicate the extent of support and characterize the
relationships between those supported action commands and the test
(with its arguments) is immensely useful and probably required for
clients that may not have complete knowledge of Sieve grammar and
semantics.
The Sieve language contains no mechanisms for indicating how a given
script should be presented in a user interface. The language also
does not contain any specific mechanisms to represent other sorts of
meta-data about the script. Providing support for such meta-data as
part of a Sieve script is currently totally implementation specific
and is usually done by imposing some type of structure on comments.
However, such information can be represented in XML very easily, so
it makes sense to define a framework to do this as part of the XML
format. Implementations MAY choose to use structured comments to
retain this information when the script is converted to normal Sieve
format.
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
The sample schemata for the XML representation of Sieve allows XML in
foreign namespaces to be inserted in the same places "comment"
elements can appear in Sieve scripts. This is the preferred means of
including additional information. Alternately, the schema defines
two display directives -- displayblock and displaydata -- as
containers for meta-data needed by graphical user interfaces.
Editors MAY use displayblock, displaydata, and foreign namespaces to
associate meta-data. Some editors find it inconvenient to preserve
this additional data during an editing session. Editors MAY preserve
this data during an editing session for compatibility with other
editors.
The displayblock element can be used to enclose any number of Sieve
statements at any level. It is semantically meaningless to the Sieve
script itself. It allows an arbitrary set of attributes.
Implementations MAY use this to provide many simple, display-related
meta-data for the Sieve such as Sieve identifier, group identifier,
order of processing, etc.
The displaydata element supports any number of arbitrary child
elements. Implementations MAY use this to represent complex data
about that Sieve such as a natural language representation of Sieve
or a way to provide the Sieve script directly.
4.2. Structured Comments
Since the XML representation is not intended as a storage format,
there needs to be a way to preserve the additional information that
can be included in the XML representation in the normal Sieve syntax.
This is done through the use of three structured comment conventions:
1. XML content in other namespaces is placed in Sieve bracketed
comments beginning with the string "/* [/" and ending with the
string "/] */".
2. The content of displaydata elements is placed in Sieve bracketed
comments beginning with the string "/* [|" and ending with the
string "|] */".
3. The beginning of a displayblock element is mapped to a bracketed
Sieve comment beginning with the string "/* [*", which then lists
any displayblock attribute names and values in XML format. The
end of a displayblock element is mapped to a comment of the form
"*] */".
Processors MUST preserve the additional information allowed in the
XML format and SHOULD use the structured comment format shown above.
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
Note: If "*/" is found in the XML content, when mapped into a
comment, it would prematurely terminate that comment. Escaping this
sequence would often be inconvenient for processors. Editors SHALL
NOT include "*/" within displayblock, displaydata, or foreign markup.
Processors MAY regard documents containing "*/" in foreign markup,
displayblock, or displaydata as invalid.
4.3. Validation
A processor MAY validate documents against a schema, and it MAY
reject any that do not conform. For any document that a processor
does not reject as invalid, any markup that the processor cannot
understand by reference to this specification MAY be discarded.
Note that example Relax NG and XML Schema are given in the appendices
below.
5. Security Considerations
Any syntactically valid Sieve script can be represented in XML.
Accordingly, all security considerations applicable to Sieve and any
extensions used also apply to the XML representation.
The use of XML carries its own security risks. Section 7 of RFC 3470
[RFC3470] discusses these risks.
It is axiomatic that a Sieve editor must be trusted to do what the
user specifies. If XML formats are used, this trust necessarily must
extend to the components involved in converting to and from XML
format.
Arbitrary data can be included using other namespaces or placed in
the extensible displayblock and displaydata constructs defined in
this specification, possibly including entire scripts and other
executable content in languages other than Sieve. Such material will
necessarily have its own security considerations, which are beyond
the scope of this document.
6. IANA Considerations
This section registers a new XML namespace per the procedures in RFC
3688 [RFC3688].
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:sieve
Registrant Contact: IETF Sieve working group
XML:
BEGIN
Sieve Namespace
Namespace for Sieve Language objects expressed in XML
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:sieve
See
RFC 5784.
END
7. References
7.1. Normative References
[OASISRNC] Clark, J., "RELAX NG Compact Syntax", OASIS Committee
Specification rnc, November 2002.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3470] Hollenbeck, S., Rose, M., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines
for the Use of Extensible Markup Language (XML)
within IETF Protocols", BCP 70, RFC 3470, January 2003.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
January 2004.
[RFC5228] Guenther, P. and T. Showalter, "Sieve: An Email Filtering
Language", RFC 5228, January 2008.
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
[XML] Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C., Maler, E., and
F. Yergeau, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth
Edition)", W3C REC-xml-20081126, November 2008,
.
7.2. Informative References
[RFC5183] Freed, N., "Sieve Email Filtering: Environment
Extension", RFC 5183, May 2008.
[RFC5229] Homme, K., "Sieve Email Filtering: Variables Extension",
RFC 5229, January 2008.
[RFC5230] Showalter, T. and N. Freed, "Sieve Email Filtering:
Vacation Extension", RFC 5230, January 2008.
[RFC5231] Segmuller, W. and B. Leiba, "Sieve Email Filtering:
Relational Extension", RFC 5231, January 2008.
[RFC5232] Melnikov, A., "Sieve Email Filtering: Imap4flags
Extension", RFC 5232, January 2008.
[RFC5233] Murchison, K., "Sieve Email Filtering: Subaddress
Extension", RFC 5233, January 2008.
[RFC5235] Daboo, C., "Sieve Email Filtering: Spamtest and Virustest
Extensions", RFC 5235, January 2008.
[RFC5293] Degener, J. and P. Guenther, "Sieve Email Filtering:
Editheader Extension", RFC 5293, August 2008.
[RFC5703] Hansen, T. and C. Daboo, "Sieve Email Filtering: MIME
Part Tests, Iteration, Extraction, Replacement, and
Enclosure", RFC 5703, October 2009.
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
Appendix A. Extended Example
The example Sieve script given in Section 9 of [RFC5228] would be
represented in XML as the following code component:
Example Sieve Filter
Declare any optional features or extensions used by the script
fileinto
Handle messages from known mailing lists.
Move messages from IETF filter discussion list to filter mailbox.
is
Sender
owner-ietf-mta-filters@imc.org
filter
move to "filter" mailbox
Keep all messages to or from people in my company.
domain
is
From
To
example.com
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 14]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
Try and catch unsolicited email. If a message is not to me,
or it contains a subject known to be spam, file it away.
all
contains
To
Cc
Bcc
me@example.com
matches
subject
*make*money*fast*
*university*dipl*mas*
spam
Move all other (non-company) mail to "personal"
mailbox.
personal
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 15]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
The same script could be annotated with graphical display hints in a
variety of ways. Three possible code components that do this are:
fileinto
is
Sender
owner-ietf-mta-filters@imc.org
filter
domain
is
From
To
example.com
all
contains
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 16]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
To
Cc
Bcc
me@example.com
matches
subject
*make*money*fast*
*university*dipl*mas*
spam
personal
Note that since displayblock elements are semantically null as far as
the script itself is concerned, they can be used to group structures
like elsif and else that are tied to statements in other groups.
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 17]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
The representation of this script in regular Sieve syntax uses
structured comments:
require "fileinto";
/* [* name="File filter list mail" order="1"
group="FILE_TO_FOLDER" enable="true" */
if header :is "Sender" "owner-ietf-mta-filters@imc.org"
{
fileinto "filter";
}
/* *] */
/* [* name="Keep all company mail" order="2"
group="KEEP_MESSAGE" enable="true" */
elsif address :domain :is [ "From", "To" ] "example.com"
{
keep;
}
/* *] */
/* [* name="File suspected spam" order="3"
group="FILE_TO_FOLDER" enable="true" */
elsif anyof ( not ( address :all :contains [ "To", "Cc", "Bcc" ]
"me@example.com" ),
header :matches "subject" [ "*make*money*fast*",
"*university*dipl*mas*" ] )
{
fileinto "spam";
}
/* *] */
/* [* name="File noncompany mail as personal" order="4"
group="FILE_TO_FOLDER" enable="true" */
else
{
fileinto "personal";
}
/* *] */
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 18]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
A separate namespace can be used to embed text or structured
information:
If the email header "Sender" is owner-ietf-mta-filters@imc.org,
then file it into the "filter" folder.
Otherwise, if the address in the "From" or "To" has a domain
that is "example.com", then keep it.
Otherwise, messages meeting with any of these conditions:
(1) None of the addresses in "To", "Cc", or "Bcc" contain
the domain "example.com".
(2) The "Subject" field matches the pattern *make*money*fast*
or *university*dipl*mas*, then file it into the "spam"
folder.
If all else fails, then file the message in the "personal"
folder.
... the actual Sieve script ...
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 19]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
Alternately, displaydata elements can be used to accomplish the same
thing:
If the email header "Sender" is owner-ietf-mta-filters@imc.org,
then file it into the "filter" folder.
Otherwise, if the address in the "From" or "To" has a domain
that is "example.com", then keep it.
Otherwise, messages meeting with any of these conditions:
(1) None of the addresses in "To","Cc", or "Bcc" contain
the domain "example.com".
(2) The "Subject" field matches the pattern *make*money*fast*
or *university*dipl*mas*, then file it into the "spam"
folder.
If all else fails, then file the message in the "personal"
folder.
... the actual Sieve script ...
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 20]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
Again, structured comments are used to represent this in regular
Sieve syntax:
/* [|
If the email header "Sender" is owner-ietf-mta-filters@imc.org,
then file it into the "filter" folder.
Otherwise, if the address in the "From" or "To" has a domain
that is "example.com", then keep it.
Otherwise, messages meeting with any of these conditions:
(1) None of the addresses in "To","Cc", or "Bcc" contain
the domain "example.com".
(2) The "Subject" field matches the pattern *make*money*fast*
or *university*dipl*mas*, then file it into the "spam"
folder.
If all else fails, then file the message in the "personal"
folder.
|] */
... the actual Sieve script ...
Appendix B. XML Schema for Sieves in XML
This appendix is informative. The following code component is an XML
Schema for the XML representation of Sieve scripts. Most of the
elements employing a complex content model allow use of elements in
other namespaces, subject to lax XML Schema validation rules.
Additionally, displaydata elements can be used to encapsulate
arbitrary XML content. Finally, displayblock elements can be used as
a general-purpose grouping mechanism -- arbitrary attributes are
allowed on displayblock elements.
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 21]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 22]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 23]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
Appendix C. Relax NG Schema for Sieves in XML
This appendix is informative. The following code component defines a
Relax NG Schema using compact notation OASISRNC [OASISRNC] for the
XML representation of Sieve scripts. Most of the elements employing
a complex content model allow unrestricted use of elements in other
namespaces. Additionally, displaydata elements can be used to
encapsulate arbitrary XML content. Finally, displayblock elements
can be used as a general-purpose grouping mechanism -- arbitrary
attributes are allowed on displayblock elements.
namespace sieve = "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:sieve"
start = element sieve:sieve { ( control | action | displayblock |
displaydata | comment | ext )* }
comment = element sieve:comment { xsd:string }
ambles =
(
( displaydata | comment | ext )*
),
empty
preamble = element sieve:preamble { ambles }
postamble = element sieve:postamble { ambles }
command =
(
attribute name {
xsd:token {
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 24]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
pattern = "[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*" } },
preamble?,
( str | num | \list | tag )*,
test?,
( control | action | displayblock)*,
postamble?
),
empty
control = element sieve:control { command }
action = element sieve:action { command }
test =
element sieve:test
{
attribute name {
xsd:token {
pattern = "[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*" } },
( str | num | \list | tag | comment | ext )*,
test*
}
\list = element sieve:list { str+ }
tag = element sieve:tag {
xsd:token {
pattern = "[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*" } }
str = element sieve:str { xsd:string }
num = element sieve:num { xsd:nonNegativeInteger }
any = ( element * { any } | attribute * { text } | text )*
ext = element * - sieve:* { any }*
displayblock =
element sieve:displayblock
{
( control | action | displayblock |
displaydata | comment | ext )*,
attribute * { text }*
}
displaydata = element sieve:displaydata { any* }
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 25]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
Appendix D. Stylesheet for Conversion from XML
This appendix is informative. The following code component is a
stylesheet that can be used to convert the Sieve in XML
representation to regular Sieve format. Content in other namespaces,
displaydata, and displayblock elements are converted to structured
comments as appropriate.
\"
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 26]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
\\
{
}
;
(
,
)
"
"
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 28]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
G
M
K
[
,
]
:
/*
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 29]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
*/
/* [*
*/
/* *] */
/* [|
|] */
/* [/
/] */
<
/>
<
>
</
>
="
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 31]
RFC 5784 An XML Representation for Sieve March 2010
"
Appendix E. Acknowledgements
The stylesheet copy mode code is loosely based on a sample code
posted to the xsl-list list by Americo Albuquerque. Jari Arkko,
Robert Burrell Donkin, Andrew McKeon, Alexey Melnikov, and Aaron
Stone provided useful comments on the document.
Authors' Addresses
Ned Freed
Sun Microsystems
800 Royal Oaks
Monrovia, CA 91016-6347
USA
Phone: +1 909 457 4293
EMail: ned.freed@mrochek.com
Srinivas Saisatish Vedam
Sun Microsystems
Phone: +91 80669 27577
EMail: Srinivas.Sv@Sun.COM
Freed & Vedam Standards Track [Page 32]